07/11/2009 2:25 pm Welcome to isteroids.com - BLOG

Thursday 15, Oct 2009

  Steroids can destroy an athlete’s image for life

Posted Byi steroids

Steroids can destroy an athlete’s image for lifeThe use of anabolic steroids and other performance-enhancing drugs are considered cheating in sports. These substances may give athletes the unfair advantage over competitors, who usually work mostly through their own efforts.

Some famous athletes fell from grace because of steroids use. Here are a few of them:

Marion Jones, a former world champion in track and field, won five medals during the 2000 Summer Olympics in Sydney, Australia. She was recently released from a six-month imprisonment from March to September 2008 for admitting guilty to a perjury charge. She lied in two grand juries about her steroid use. Her name was also linked to the BALCO scandal and all her medals and winning records were stripped away from her.

Just like Marion Jones, Barry Bonds was also involved in the BALCO scandal. The seven-timer MVP awardee is considered one of the greatest baseball players of all time. However, he spent his 2008 baseball season without any activity.

Many athletes think that they could just get away with it. Many athletes are not stopped from taking anabolic steroids to improve their overall performance.

However, once they are caught, their careers are over or it may suffer from never-ending criticisms. Fans may even lose trust and confidence in the athlete and in the game.

From Test Country:

Steroid use in sports is cheating in the eyes of sports authorities. That is because the use of anabolic steroids and other similar drugs enhances the performance of an athlete and gives the athlete an unfair advantage over others working mostly through their own efforts. It violates the honor-bound code that sportsmen are supposed to follow.

Thursday 23, Jul 2009

  Reggie Jackson uses his voice against Steroid Users

Posted Byi steroids

Reggie Jackson uses his voice against Steroid UsersReggie Jackson, a two-time World Series most valuable player, has said that there is no room for baseball players who used steroids during their playing days to make an impression, in the hall of fame.

Jackson, who played Major League Baseball from 1967-1987, is one of the best baseball players ever and presently holds the 12th position on the all-time list for maximum home runs with 563 to his credit.

Some of the players who have outplayed him in the rankings had confessed to taking steroids in the past and the list includes big names, namely, Alex Rodriguez, Rafael Palmeiro, Mark McGwire, Sammy Sosa, and Barry Bonds.

From Bloomberg.com:

“It bothers me,” Jackson said in an interview with Bloomberg Television in New York. “A lot of Hall of Famers are very offended by it. I am starting to get affected and I am hoping that those guys that get caught don’t get into the Hall of Fame.”

Jackson, who played for the New York Yankees from 1977 to 1981 and now serves as a special adviser to the team, also said that he misses the old Yankee Stadium. The Yankees moved this season from the ballpark that was home to 26 World Series championship teams, including two of his own, to their new venue across the street.

“I never really saw the new stadium when they were building it,” Jackson said. “I hung out at the old one. I had a difficult time leaving it. The last day I went out with a couple of friends and we walked around the stadium and I sat in the center field block with the fans and others and got a little teary-eyed.”

In an interview with the Bloomberg Television in New York, Jackson said that baseball greats like him who never used steroids to gain an unfair advantage feel offended to be ranked lower than those who cheat the game and fans by taking steroids.

Monday 06, Apr 2009

  Barry Bonds finally got a blow from legal troubles

Posted Byi steroids

Barry Bonds finally got a blow from legal troublesIt seems like the strecthing of Barry Bond’s trial period did not bring any good news for the star. Bonds’ legal troubles could bring him down both in contracts and public popularity. Despite displaying some of the best offensive talent in baseball history and breaking record of Hank Aaron’s most home runs, Bonds failed to win the hearts of baseball fans just because of his current legal problems.

According to SportsNation view Aaron still held the position as the home run king, though no team approached to sign the aging slugger. Bonds would be a great replacment over the other designated hitters, but most of the teams seem to be unwilling to deal with him in the current scenario.

However, these concerns are somewhat irrelevant in front of Bonds’ actual legal problems. But it doesn’t mean that the situation will not have an adverse effect on his celebrity quotient as Bonds’ trial period can coincide with the MLB season. It possibly becomes a distraction for the entire game season.

Barry Bonds was booked under the charge of giving false satement to a federal grand jury about using performance enhancing drugs and in this matter trial period was going on and on. According to the latest court hearing, the trial period would now start in July.

From ESPN:

In some ways, it seems Barry Bonds has been convicted in the court of public opinion. Despite putting up some of the best offensive seasons in baseball history and breaking Hank Aaron’s hallowed home run record, SportsNation still thinks of Aaron as the home run king, and no team has made overtures to sign the aging slugger. Bonds would immediately be an improvement over the vast majority of American League designated hitters, but teams seem to be unwilling to deal with the circus he represents.

However, these concerns are somewhat petty in the face of Bonds’ actual legal problems. Under indictment for the charge of lying to a federal grand jury about using performance enhancing drugs, Bonds’ trial could start in July, just as the MLB season is heating up. It promises to be (at the very least) a distraction, possibly consuming the entire summer news cycle.

Will Bonds be convicted? Could one of baseball’s greatest be serving time in jail? Would you want your team to pick him up, despite the risk?

Saturday 14, Mar 2009

  ETHNICITY SHOULD BE CONSIDERED IN DRUG TESTING

Posted Byi steroids

ETHNICITY SHOULD BE CONSIDERED IN DRUG TESTINGDrug tests conducted among athletes in international sports may not be accurate, according to Swiss researchers who are asking for the temporary suspension of ongoing drug testing of foreign athletes. This inaccuracy would be due to ethnic differences that had not been taken into consideration prior to administering the tests.

The British Journal of Sports Medicine published this study at the height of the steroid use in international sports. According to the said study the ratio of testosterone and epitosterone in the urine tells whether the specimen is positive for steroid content. The threshold for athletes is four and above. But it has been discovered that this threshold varies depending on the ethnicity. It has been proven that the gene UGT2B17 varies for every ethnicity. These variations affect the metabolic rate and consequently affects the rate of testosterone that comes out of the urine.

From The Los Angeles Times:

In the new study, Swiss researchers demonstrated the inaccuracy of using a threshold of four for everyone. They added steroids to urine samples from 171 athletes: 57 men of black African ethnicity, 32 of Asian ethnicity, 32 of Hispanic ethnicity and 50 Caucasians. The men were soccer players between the ages of 18 and 36. The researchers found a variation in the UGT2B17 gene in 22% of the athletes, including eight out of 10 Asian men.

Based on the genetic variations, the researchers recalibrated the thresholds for suspected doping for each group and concluded an appropriate threshold would be 5.6 for men of black African ethnicity, 5.7 for Caucasians, 5.8 for Hispanics and 3.8 for Asian men.

International sports stars like Barry Bonds, Major League baseball stars Roger Clemens and Alex Rodriguez now face the consequences of being involved in steroids use. Both Bonds and Clemens face perjury raps for allegedly lying about their steroid use. Rodriguez on the other hand had admitted that he used PEDs in 2001-2003 while with the Texas Rangers.

Thursday 05, Mar 2009

  THE NEVER-ENDING BONDS’ TRIAL

Posted Byi steroids

the-never-ending-bondse28099-trialJust a week ago, questions about the jurors on Barry Bonds’ trial was all over the news. Everyone back then was quiet confident that the perjury trial will be pushing through. Unfortunately, the prosecution had requested that the trial be moved due to lack of evidence. Their appeal on an evidentiary ruling will probably push the trial down a few more months. The trial is expected to be around June or July. There have been mixed opinions on the actions of the prosecution.

From Daily News:

Peter Keane, a law professor at Golden Gate University and a close observer of the BALCO trial, was surprised by the late-game delay, which he called “foolish.”

“A bush league stunt like this on the eve of the trial tells me they aren’t comfortable with what they got,” Keane says. “To pull a play like this makes them look like they don’t know what they are doing.”

At issue is Anderson’s refusal to testify, despite extraordinary pressure placed upon him by prosecutors, who declined to comment on their decisions.

Not until after Anderson formally lodged his refusal on Friday did prosecutors notify the U.S. District Court Judge Susan Illston that they will appeal her recent decision to exclude a pile of evidence unless Anderson can validate it under oath.

That body of material includes doping calendars and positive drug tests, but without interpretation from Anderson, Illston says, the evidence is “classic hearsay.”

In the defense of the prosecution, they will be having a hard time convincing the jurors without the said urine samples which tested positive for anabolic steroids. No one could link these samples to Bonds except Anderson himself. Since Anderson still won’t testify, the samples are rather useless. Maybe the prosecution still needs time to convince the trainer to cooperate. Regardless of the reason, the prosecutions decision to delay the trial makes them look back and rather unprepared.

Monday 02, Mar 2009

  THE PRESS: PUSHING TO MAKE JURY DATA PUBLIC

Posted Byi steroids

the-press-pushing-to-make-jury-data-publicUS District Judge Susan Illston is a very familiar name in the Barry Bonds perjury trial. A few weeks ago, she announced that she will be excluding the samples that would have been used by the prosecution to prove that the athlete had been using steroids. Just last week, she ordered that the forms that will be filled out by the potential jurors in the court trial be kept from the public. The prospective and trial jurors were made to answer a 60-question form which involved some questions on their beliefs, religion and other personal information. These jurors have been following the progress of the trial and of Bonds’ steroid use scandal for quite some time now. They will soon be facing defense and prosecution lawyers and Illston herself in order to explain their answers to the forms. After that, a total of 14 jurors will be chosen— twelve main ones and 2 alternates. Recently, the media has begun trying to convince the court to make the data on the jurors public as they see that there is no need to keep these information from the press.

From The Associated Press:

The Associated Press, ESPN, Hearst Corp., The New York Times Co., ABC-subsidiary KGO, KNTV Television Inc., NBC subsidiary KNBC-TV, The Los Angeles Times, the Medianews Group and Sports Illustrated publisher Time Inc. filed court papers seeking public access to the forms.

Media company lawyers argued that the questionnaires should be considered part of the jury-selection process, which is required to be done in open court. The lawyers noted that neither Bonds’ lawyers nor federal prosecutors have asked the judge to seal the documents.

Thursday 19, Feb 2009

  MORE WITNESSES TO BARRY BONDS’ TRIAL

Posted Byi steroids

more-witnesses-to-barry-bondse28099-trialFederal prosecutors on the Barry Bonds case have brought in more witnesses to testify against the former Giants catcher. While Greg Anderson, Bonds’ former trainer still doesn’t want to show up in court, several close friends of Bonds will be used as government witnesses to testify that the athlete had indeed used anabolic steroids in his career.

Among the list of witnesses are Kathy Hoskins and her brother Steve Hoskins, both childhood friends of Bonds. The defense was already aware that Steve would be testifying although they have just recently learned of Kathy’s participation. Kathy used to be Bonds’ assistant and personal shopper, and had traveled with him in several occasions.

From San Francisco Chronicle:

And for the first time, prosecutors said they have a witness who says she saw Bonds being injected by Anderson - Hoskins, who is also the sister of Bonds’ former longtime business manager, Steve Hoskins, another key government witness.

In 2003, Steve Hoskins secretly tape-recorded a conversation in which Anderson described the regimen of undetectable drugs he was giving Bonds, the government says.

In Friday’s filing, prosecutors did not assert that the injection Bonds allegedly received from Anderson contained banned drugs. Nevertheless, the claim is significant, because in his testimony before the grand jury that investigated BALCO, Bonds said he had never received an injection of any kind from Anderson, saying he had received injections only from doctors.

Kim Bell, Bonds‘ former girlfriend will also be standing in as a witness although the defense has claimed that she would be doing it in order to publicize her tell-all book. Bell claimed that Bonds admitted to her that he had been injecting with anabolic steroids and that she had also noticed steroid side effects including back acne and shrunken testicles.

Thursday 12, Feb 2009

  URINE SAMPLE RE-TESTING—THE NEW TREND IN BASEBALL?

Posted Byi steroids

urine sample testing baseballFirst there was Roger Clemens who was charged with doping. Then there was Barry Bonds who was charged with doping and lying, and was probably taken by surprise when his supposedly destroyed urine sample resurfaced and yielded positive results. And now there is Alex Rodriguez, the baseball superstar who is now under public judgment because the documents that listed supposedly confidential test results in 2003 were found along with his positive steroid test. You think that the rest of the 104 listed positive should be the only ones scared. Apparently, that is not the case. Even those that tested negative back then could be subject to some re-analyzing. Remember Bonds testing negative at first then positive after a few years? The feds might be considering the same in this case.

From Daily News:

Even those who tested negative could be subject to re-testing as a result of the Players’ Association’s failure to destroy the spreadsheet with the names of those who tested positive.

There are believed to be 525 negative urine samples in the hands of the government in addition to the 104 positive samples.

After the testing process was completed in 2003, union officials had the right to destroy the documents that connected names to actual urine samples. Sources close to the union defend its inaction, saying it would have been improper to destroy urine samples and test documents because they were potential evidence in the ongoing BALCO probe.

The laboratory that did the tests should have destroyed the samples whether positive or negative. It didn’t though and now we have 525 urine samples to analyze with more modern tests. That could mean over a hundred more Barry Bonds.

Wednesday 11, Feb 2009

  DEFENSE GAINS UPPER HAND IN BONDS TRIAL

Posted Byi steroids

judge-steroidsU.S. District Judge Susan Illston will be giving the prosecution for the Barry Bonds’ case a very hard time this coming trial. She has mentioned that she might be forbidding the use of the records taken from the raid in the Nevada laboratory that had run the anabolic steroids drug tests as evidence. According to Illston, the prosecution will not be able to link the urine and blood samples tested to Bonds. There is no concrete proof that these samples really belong to the athlete. Amidst the protests, prosecutors know that they do lack the important witness to do this.

From The Mercury News

Illston is expected to issue a final decision soon, but if she blocks use of the drug tests it would mark the strongest suggestion yet that prosecutors will be hobbled because they lack the testimony of Greg Anderson, Bonds’ former personal trainer who has steadfastly refused to cooperate and tell his account in a courtroom.

Federal prosecutors insist Anderson supplied Bonds with steroids, and that he was responsible for getting his urine and blood tested through Balco, the now-defunct Peninsula lab at the heart of the biggest sports doping scandal in history. But unless Anderson were to testify that he did so, defense lawyers have argued that there is no way to validate the steroids tests, or to ensure Bonds’ legal right to cross-examine Anderson, who would be his chief accuser in absentia.

Without Anderson, the defense will have the upper hand. Prosecutors need Anderson to testify that Bonds did use performance enhancing drugs. Unfortunately for them, the former trainer has not expressed any intention to show up amidst possible contempt charges and serving another year in prison. Although the government knows that the documents they have are enough to charge Bonds of lying, they lack the legal means to do

Tuesday 10, Feb 2009

  BONDS PAYS THE PRICE OF BEING ACCUSED OF STEROID USE

Posted Byi steroids

barry_bonds-steroidsIn his most recent article, Bruce Jenkins talks about one thing— justice. He looks at the word in terms of what is happening to famous Major League players, Barry Bonds and the man’s present battle with the law. Bonds is one of the many who had been accused of steroid use. He is also one of the many who had denied the accusation, saying that he didn’t know that he was taking anabolic steroids. Whatever the outcome of his trial, Bonds will be paying a high price. It seems unfair however since he should be in the same boat as many other baseball players if it was just strictly about steroid abuse. But Bonds stood out because he is loud and he is a highly skilled athlete.

From The San Francisco Gate:

People seem to forget the climate of the times, particularly the winter of 2000-01, during which prosecutors contend that Bonds (about to set the single-season home run record) tested positive twice for steroids. The players universally believed that everything was cool, that Major League Baseball wasn’t at all interested in enforcement (and it wasn’t), that they could get away with any foray into the world of performance-enhancing drugs, and that they indulged themselves by the hundreds. Bonds is on trial for perjury, but that’s just a technicality against the feds’ underlying purpose of bringing down the face of the Steroid Era, a man whose relentless arrogance bugged the hell out of them.

Bonds is accused of lying but if you look closer, didn’t Commissioner Bud Selig himself lie about not being aware of steroids in baseball back in July 1998? He denied any knowledge amidst news on Jose Canseco’s use of performance enhancing drugs several years before. Bonds will slowly watch his name become tainted and pinned with the words “steroid use” for years to come. This is a punishment far beyond jail and it makes you wonder why other players have not gone through this much.

Next »