07/11/2009 2:23 pm Welcome to isteroids.com - BLOG

Saturday 10, Oct 2009

  Anabolic steroids offer competitive edge to Power Lifters long after doping has ended

Posted Byi steroids

Anabolic steroids offer competitive edge to Power Lifters long after doping has endedA team of researchers involved in ascertaining the impact of anabolic steroid use on power lifters years after the use is no longer prevalent has found that changes in the shoulder and quadriceps attained by steroid use tend to stay with steroid users years after discontinuation of steroids.

It is noteworthy to note here that anabolic steroids are synthetic hormones that are derived from testosterone, the male hormone and their use has much been in debate in professional sports where muscle strength is paramount.

From Sciencedaily.com:

Findings

The researchers found that several years after anabolic steroid withdrawal, and with no or low current strength-training, the muscle fiber area intensity, the number of nuclei per fiber in the quadriceps was still comparable to that of athletes that were currently performing high intensity strength-training. They also discovered that the shoulder-neck fiber areas were comparable to high-intensity trained athletes and the number of nuclei per fiber was even higher than found in the current steroid-using group.

Conclusions

According to the lead researcher, Dr. Eriksson, ”It is possible that the high number of nuclei we found in the muscle might be beneficial for an athlete who continues or resumes strength training because increased myonuclei opens up the possibility of increasing protein synthesis, which can lead to muscle mass.”  He added, “Based on the characteristics between doped and non-doped power lifters, we conclude that a period of anabolic steroid usage is an advantage for a power lifter in competition, even several years after they stop taking a doping drug.”

It is evident from this study that even a period of anabolic steroid usage is more than enough to be an advantage for a power lifter in competitive events, even after passage of several years after doping has been discontinued by the power lifter.

Tuesday 06, Oct 2009

  Anabolic Steroids and anti-social behavior blend well together

Posted Byi steroids

Anabolic Steroids and anti-social behavior blend well togetherThere is a possible connection between the use of anabolic steroids and antisocial behavior, as per researchers from Sweden.

Anabolic steroids are synthetic drugs that are related to male sex hormones and can be administered orally as well as through injections. In today’s times, more and more males and females are making non-prescription steroid use for building muscles and increasing the levels of body strength and endurance to look and feel better.

From News-Medical.Net:

Dr. Fia Klötz of Uppsala University in Sweden, and colleagues studied the associations between criminality and steroid use in 1,440 Swedish residents tested for the drugs between 1995 and 2001.

They found that those who tested positive for steroid use were about twice as likely to have been convicted of a weapons offence and one and a half times as likely to have been convicted of fraud.

It appears that the use of anabolic steroids is associated with a lifestyle involving crime, including weapons offences and fraud, but did not appear to be associated with violent crimes or crimes against property.

The authors say aggressiveness appears to occasionally trigger violent behaviour, sometimes even including homicide and steroid use is linked to extreme mood swings, impulsiveness, depression, paranoid jealousy, extreme irritability, delusions and impaired judgment.

In short, it can be easily said that non-prescription steroid use and/or steroid abuse can prove fatal and lead to antisocial behavior such as signs of maniac or hypomania episodes, development of suicidal tendencies, increased level of aggression, and psychotic episodes.

Sunday 04, Oct 2009

  Anabolic steroids helpful to HIV patients for putting weight and muscle mass

Posted Byi steroids

Anabolic steroids helpful to HIV patients for putting weight and muscle massAccording to suggestions of a new review, patients suffering from HIV who are treated with anabolic steroids for prevention of AIDS wasting tend to experience modest gains in weight and muscle mass.

The concerned review covered thirteen studies of adults aged 24-42 with HIV, 294 of whom received anabolic steroids for a period of at least 6 weeks and 238 of whom were administered with placebo. It was noticed that the average weight increase in those administered with anabolic steroids was approximately three pounds.

From News-Medical.Net:

AIDS wasting, which leads to significant weight loss in people with HIV, causes severe loss of weight and muscle and can lead to muscle weakness, organ failure and shortened lifespan. Researchers have long sought to reverse this common, destructive effect of HIV with mixed success.

The wasting stems from loss of the body’s ability to grow muscle and from low levels of testosterone.

Anabolic steroids are synthetic substances similar to the male sex hormone testosterone that promote growth of skeletal muscle and the development of male sexual characteristics.

Although most recently in the news for their misuse by professional athletes, anabolic steroids have legitimate medical application for men with low testosterone and people with certain types of anemia. Two anabolic steroids available in the United States, nandrolone decanoate and oxandrolone, have been used to help increase weight and muscle mass in small studies of people with wasting.

Conversely, anabolic steroid use has been associated with increased rates of HIV in those who share needles or use nonsterile needles when they inject steroids.

Lead author Karen Johns, a medical assessment officer from the agency Health Canada, remarked that the side effects and risks of using anabolic steroids in the long-term is surely of a concern.

Monday 28, Sep 2009

  Steroid scenes in South Africa

Posted Byi steroids

Steroid scenes in South AfricaWith steroids reaching every part of the world, South Africa was not an exception. This beautiful country is slowly showing signs of being grappled with steroids as there are more and more reported cases of steroid use.

It is a well-known fact that steroids have been in the worlds of professional sports and bodybuilding for long and if one thinks that South Africa was left out, he was probably wrong.

From SteroidTimes.Com:

So let me start by dispelling a popular myth or rumour that i often get asked about:  STEROIDS ARE NOT LEGAL IN SOUTH AFRICA! That said, steroid are not a highly policed area in the drug market, any ‘busts’ or the like generally come from bodybuilders or dealers that are involved in manufacturing or importing other illicit drugs such as cocaine, exstacy, khat or crystal meth. The reality is that there are just not enough resources in South Africa to control such a small segment of the drug trade, they have bigger fish to fry.

We have a range of anabolic products from black market to legitimate available to the athlete or bodybuilder. Many pharmacies are quite happy to sell drugs such a steroids, growth hormone, thyroid hormones and insulin ‘under the counter’ as long as cash is paid, the better you know the pharmacist, the better price you get. Those products that are not available from a pharmacy can be obtained relatively easily from your entrepreneurial gym dealer who will generally have at his disposal a range of imported or local underground brands.

The growing success and popularity of steroids have clearly suggested that all measures to curb the use of steroids have been waste as the number of steroid users has increased, and not decreased during the last few years.

Thursday 17, Sep 2009

  Michael Jackson was spending $48k per month on drugs

Posted Byi steroids

Michael Jackson was spending $48k per month on drugsAccording to recent reports, Michael Jackson was spending as much as $48,000 per month on prescription drugs such as Diprivan and Demerol.

The finding is more than an enough testimony to reaffirm that the relationship between steroids and celebrities is still going strong despite claims from the government that steroid use is on an all-time low and stringent measures have been already implemented to curb the use of steroids.

From Merinews.com:

REPORTS HAVE surfaced that pop superstar Michael Jackson was spending as much as 48,000 dollar per month on prescription drugs, including Demerol and Diprivan.

A sidelight of this story is the pharmacy that news reports say filled and delivered many of those orders: Mickey Fine Pharmacy & Grill in Beverly Hills.

Mickey Fine is a pretty snazzy-looking place. It was originally one of those legendary Schwab Pharmacies where starlets were discovered while drinking milkshakes. As recently as March, it was a featured location in the Starz comedy series ‘Head Case‘.

It’s not the kind of place you would normally associate with supplying a prescription drug habit.

Now that MJ has departed too soon, this latest news is bound to create awareness among steroid users who often think that steroids are harmless. However, it is important to note here that steroids do not bring side effects with them but they can prove to be lethal when abused and what has happened with Jackson was a pure case of steroid abuse and nothing more.

If you are using steroids, then it is high time that you start understanding the pros and cons of steroids else what has happened to MJ can even happen to you. The only thing that can help you here is nothing but qualified awareness.

Wednesday 02, Sep 2009

  Higher rejection incidence keenly associated with early steroid withdrawal

Posted Byi steroids

Higher rejection incidence keenly associated with early steroid withdrawalAccording to a new study, there is a high incidence of rejection and low incidence of intolerance necessitating treatment for diabetes in human beings when it comes to early steroid withdrawal following liver transplantation.

The results of this first double-blind placebo-controlled study were published in an issue of Liver Transplantation, the official journal of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) and the International Liver Transplantation Society (ILTS) and were focused on examining the effects of early steroid elimination.

From Eurekalert.org:

The normal course of treatment after liver transplantation includes calcineurin inhibitors (a class of immunosuppressants) and steroids to minimize rejection and improve survival rates, but the long-term complications of these drugs can be fatal. Steroid use in particular can lead to diabetes, high cholesterol and hypertension, which increase the risk of heart disease, and can lead to death. Several previous studies have reported that early withdrawal from steroids reduced the incidence of these side effects, but that rejection increased, although it could be controlled with steroid pulse therapy (in which high doses of steroids are administered intravenously for a short period of time). The current multicenter study was the first prospective double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to compare early steroid withdrawal with continued use.

Led by Georges-Philippe Pageaux, of the Centre Hospitalier University St.-Eloi in Montpellier, France, the study examined 174 patients in 15 French liver transplantation centers over a 14-month period from December 1999 to August 2001. The patients were randomly divided into two groups seven days following transplant: 90 of them continued to receive steroids for six months, while 84 received a placebo starting at day 14 (following 7 days of tapering from steroids). At the end of six months, 22 patients in the steroid group (24.4 percent) and 32 patients in the placebo group (38.1 percent) experienced acute rejection. Although there was no statistical difference in the two groups for high cholesterol and hypertension, 22.2 percent of patients in the steroid group developed diabetes compared with 14.3 percent of placebo patients. At the end of 12 months, the incidence of acute rejection was 25.6 percent in the steroid group versus 39.3 percent in the placebo group, but there no longer a difference in diabetes between the two groups.

It was concluded by the involved authors that early steroid withdrawal at day 14 cannot be termed as a safe practice though this practice is efficient in terms of tolerability to glucose.

Wednesday 26, Aug 2009

  Higher rejection incidence following early steroid withdrawal

Posted Byi steroids

Higher rejection incidence following early steroid withdrawal  According to a new study on early steroid withdrawal following liver transplantation, it has been revealed that there is a high incidence of rejection and a low incidence of intolerance that necessitates treatment for diabetes. This first double-blind placebo-controlled study was conducted to examine the effects of early steroid elimination.

The results of this study were published in an issue of Liver Transplantation, the official journal of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) and the International Liver Transplantation Society (ILTS).

From Eurekalert.org:

The normal course of treatment after liver transplantation includes calcineurin inhibitors (a class of immunosuppressants) and steroids to minimize rejection and improve survival rates, but the long-term complications of these drugs can be fatal. Steroid use in particular can lead to diabetes, high cholesterol and hypertension, which increase the risk of heart disease, and can lead to death. Several previous studies have reported that early withdrawal from steroids reduced the incidence of these side effects, but that rejection increased, although it could be controlled with steroid pulse therapy (in which high doses of steroids are administered intravenously for a short period of time). The current multicenter study was the first prospective double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to compare early steroid withdrawal with continued use.

Led by Georges-Philippe Pageaux, of the Centre Hospitalier University St.-Eloi in Montpellier, France, the study examined 174 patients in 15 French liver transplantation centers over a 14-month period from December 1999 to August 2001. The patients were randomly divided into two groups seven days following transplant: 90 of them continued to receive steroids for six months, while 84 received a placebo starting at day 14 (following 7 days of tapering from steroids). At the end of six months, 22 patients in the steroid group (24.4 percent) and 32 patients in the placebo group (38.1 percent) experienced acute rejection. Although there was no statistical difference in the two groups for high cholesterol and hypertension, 22.2 percent of patients in the steroid group developed diabetes compared with 14.3 percent of placebo patients. At the end of 12 months, the incidence of acute rejection was 25.6 percent in the steroid group versus 39.3 percent in the placebo group, but there no longer a difference in diabetes between the two groups.

The authors concluded that early steroid withdrawal at day 14 is not considered to be completely safe in terms of rejection but it was also found that it is efficient in terms of glucose tolerability.

Friday 07, Aug 2009

  Are Steroids good for Sports?

Posted Byi steroids

Are Steroids good for Sports?In today’s sporting world, sportsmen and audience do not talk about the use of steroids in sports. This is because they know that steroids have become an integral part of their lives and there is no point in blaming steroids as they help in fulfilling those previously unattained, unexplored, and unfeasible acts.

A small majority of individuals who blamed modern-day sportsmen are those who themselves used steroids at times. The only difference is that they were not caught as past-day technologies were not capable of confirming a steroid use. But, today things can be tracked to some extent. It is high time they grow up and accept the game as it is.

From Huffingpost.com:

Does anyone really care if someone damaged his or her health by working too many hours? It happens every day. So why are we worried about what millionaire athletes do?

Steroids can be used responsibly if prescribed by a doctor. Maybe that’s why the AMA was AGAINST making them a controlled substance. And here’s something to think about: If there were a drug with marginal side effects that would make you smarter, would you take it? And what if it enabled you to excel to the point where you could double your earnings? What if not using them meant failure?

The cat is out of the bag and he isn’t going back in. These drugs do amazing things and they will continue to be used. They come with a risk however. I’d rather see that risk controlled than have the users sneak around and support a black market in order to engage in what should be their inalienable right of free choice as long as the consequences don’t endanger anyone else. As far as I’m concerned, if I want to juggle a couple of flaming chainsaws in the privacy of my own home, that’s my option. It’s funny to see the people who scream the loudest about civil liberties leading the march against others should and shouldn’t do.

I’m not advocating or endorsing steroid use, but it’s here to stay. And the biggest irony of it all is that most fans don’t care. They’d rather see their favorite players playing, instead of penalized. What is the more egregious crime is the price of the tickets. And for that kind of money, I want to see a great performance, however it’s achieved. And although I’m not a fan of the Hall of Fame in that it’s not a museum as much as an elite club determined by committee, there should be an asterisk next to McQuire, Bonds, et al stating: “Post enhancement era.” Would that be so hard?

Just as these drugs will add a few years to the career of a great pitcher by replacing that lost mile or two an hour on his fastball, they can extend youth and vitality for aging baby boomers. If used properly.

The point is - steroids do not offer something bad to its users. They do not even harm unless they are abused. So, what’s the point in blaming them? The earlier people realize this fact, the better. One thing that just cannot be denied is the fact steroids and sports are almost inseparable.

Tuesday 12, May 2009

  Research reviews on Steroid treatment for hearing loss!

Posted Byi steroids

Research reviews on Steroid treatment for hearing loss!Medical science is not unaware of steroid use being largely prescribed for sudden loss of hearing particularly sensorineural in nature. A number of researches have been carried out randomly since many years now, the result of which can be read in the issue of Archives of Otolaryngology, Head & neck surgery. In this, you will get to have a look at the systematic review and meta- analysis carried forth in sudden hearing impairment.

Ideally when this occurs, one undergoes a loss of atleast 30 decibles of hearing within test frequencies happening in three days. Though the treatment varies drastically from having herbs to vitamins to minerals, some authors have also went on to term the steroid therapy employed for the same as the gold treatment.

From news-medical.net:

Anne Elizabeth Conlin, B.A. & Sc., M.D., of the University of Ottawa, Ontario, and Lorne S. Parnes, M.D., F.R.C.S.C., of the University of Western Ontario, London, Canada, searched for all randomized clinical trials evaluating treatments for sudden hearing loss published between 1966 and 2006.

“To our knowledge, no valid randomized controlled trial exists to determine effective treatment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss,” they conclude. “Systemic steroids cannot be considered the gold standard of treatment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss, given the severe limitations of the landmark study supporting their use.”

Treating sudden hearing loss is difficult because its cause is often unknown, the authors note. However, it is still important to identify the therapy that most benefits the patient. “At present, sudden sensorineural hearing loss remains a medical emergency without a scientific understanding of its cause or a rational approach to its treatment,” they conclude.

The most prominent details about the same you’ll get to know in an article which has been cited as a landmark study particularly for the use of steroids. This is indeed not described as a random trial and thus might have produced exaggerated effects of the treatment as per the authors. The authors also suggested that this study employed inconsistent doses of steroids which did not measure the result for all participants.

Though the ambiguity about recommended use of steroid therapy still continues, there are still many clinical experts which do support the drug.

Thursday 20, Nov 2008

  Steroids Saved My Life: Episode 10

Posted Byi steroids

We’ve previously written about “Steroids Saved My Life”, and now here’s an update on this cyber reality series.

The skinny nerd Peter Brown is now on Week #10 of his anabolic steroid intake. He now weighs in at 162.6 lbs. On Week #1, he tipped the scales at a paltry 138 lbs.

On Episode 10, Peter talks about his training regimen. He’s working out five days a week and his routine is primarily focused on basic compound exercises. And his caloric intake? He consumes more than 3700 calories per day he says on his 10th video which currently has more than 206,000 views on YouTube.

Peter’s had a hard time gaining muscle mass throughout his life and, according to him, had resulted to his lack of self-confidence because of this problem. This is the reason why he decided to experiment with steroids to “shock his system into growth”.

Here are important statistics on this guy: he’s 22 years old, 6’1”, and his goal is to reach 168 lbs in 12 weeks.

With just two more episodes to go, the question on most viewers’ minds is “Can Peter Brown accomplish his goal?”

Next »